The reinforcement of the transatlantic relationship, secret operations on all sides, skirmishes between the Chinese and North Americans in the China Sea, trade wars, hard rights rising, warning shots on financial markets… It looks like the world is about to switch to “something completely different” (as the Monty Pythons would say). An explosion of markets? Cold War? Hot war? Or labour pains?
We invite you to read carefully the ‘calendar of future events’ we are presenting in this bulletin. It clearly reveals that the October-November 2018 period represents a gigantic tipping point for the global systemic crisis that we have been analysing since 2006. Huge restructuring energies are emerging, particularly around ASEAN, in the context of US sanctions against Iran and with mid-term elections in the sights. All this is enough to upset the financial markets which do not know what sauce they will be served with.
And now for a set of explanatory proposals…
4 November: Iran versus the world
Our readers know how much attention we pay to the strategy of the Saudi-Israeli-American camp concerning Iran. The battle going on since Donald Trump announced the withdrawal of the US from the Iranian nuclear deal really deserves the prize for the most breathtaking scenario at the next Oscars. The question arising in this final period before the implementation of the sanctions is as follows: Can the world support the freezing of its oil reserves if the mullahs’ regime does not make a move? But as the deadline approaches, with Iran having resisted pressure, the world is getting frantic about circumventing these sanctions. Clearly, it is unable to support the withdrawal of the 157 billion barrels of Iranian reserves from the market. Hence, Iran is winning this standoff and it is the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia which are likely to find themselves isolated. So, what is on the next page of this script?
The case of journalist Khashoggi, in which Turkey is accusing Saudi Arabia of assassination in its consulate in Istanbul, is a new twist, providing a tangible expression of the unsustainability of imposing the 4 November deadline, thus forcing a reversal of the situation with respect to Iran. Indeed, this case is causing a complete turnaround of the international community vis-à-vis Saudi Arabia and is clearly playing in favour of Iran. So close to the deadline of 4th November, the exploitation of this case by the actors concerned is not by chance. One might even wonder if the oil sector, anticipating relative failure of the sanctions against Iran, does not see there the occasion to create a new front of reserves’ freeze to maintain oil prices high… though that sounds like madness and inevitably a counter-productive strategy. In any event, even in the USA, even in the Republican camp, senators like Marco Rubio are calling for a strong response against Saudi Arabia to safeguard the country’s ‘moral credibility’. Trump is withstanding for the moment, believing that cutting arms supplies (or oil supplies) is like punishing himself.
Be that as it may, the debate over the undeclared Iran-AS conflict has clearly shifted the balance and the future of Israel and the Middle East along with it. The terms of the new standoff could soon become as follows: ‘Saudi Arabia/UAE will first withdraw from Yemen and Iran will follow by withdrawing from Syria/Lebanon.’ These terms are at least as legitimate at this stage as the previous ones, namely: ‘Saudi Arabia stopped funding ISIS and other terrorist groups (in August 2017) and Iran must now stop funding the Hezbollah.’ But this new negotiating axis bypasses the trio US-AS-Israel who have lost the hand to the benefit of a vaguer group composed of Europe, Turkey, Iran, China and Russia. How will the United States respond to this new situation?
6 November: A new American policy?
The mid-term elections are likely to reduce Donald Trump’s power by decreasing his majority in the House of Representatives. On the one hand, since 1934, these elections have systematically been sanctioning the party in power. However, on the other, the failure of the Iranian strategy and especially the heating of the markets, are rather bad omen for him. That said, depending on the outcome of the election and the degree of sanction that American opinion will offer him or not, Trump will more or less hold on to the cards to be able to follow up with the strategies he has posed during his first two years of presidency.
We usually say that the most dangerous of Trump or the US state apparatus is the second. Do not forget that China’s ‘quad’ encirclement strategy idea belonged to Hillary Clinton, that the Chinese are demanding to talk with D. Trump rather than with his personnel, that no conflict has been triggered in the two years of Trump presidency despite an ultra-sensitive international context, that a peace plan has been launched with North Korea… In short, our team is actually quite worried about what the US state apparatus, reinforced by the mid-term elections, could do with the systemic transition strategy that Donald Trump has started. We remind you, too, that a state apparatus is not an intelligent being, but a machine programmed to repeat indefinitely the processes required to maintain the conditions of its own existence: NATO needs the Cold War to exist, financial markets need expensive oil to prosper, the US state apparatus needs to be the master of the world to work properly, and so on…
End of October: Asia/ASEAN at work
Apparently, we are not the only ones to worry about this. It is reflected in the Asia/ASEAN agenda in the weeks preceding, not by chance, these pivotal dates of 4 and 6 November…
Subscribe to read more in the GEAB 128
 See the latest GEAB which addresses (and maintains) a course for strengthening the transatlantic relationship in the near future. Source: GEAB N°127, 15/09/2018
 Twisted Skripal case (source: The Telegraph, 10/10/2018); alleged assassination of Khashoggi at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul (source: The Atlantic, 12/10/2018); alleged cyberattack of the Russian anti-doping (source: Time, 04/10/2018); etc.
 Source: The Economist, 04/10/2018
 Source: Bloomberg, 14/10/2018
 We kindly invite you to re-read our analysis describing a standoff with Iran in which the US manages to voluntarily train the rest of the planet, with the aim of bringing down the mullahs’ regime and consequently bring Israel to change their position and the Middle East to free itself from the shackles of the last century.
 Source: Fox News, 14/10/2018
 Source: Haaretz, 14/10/2018
 « The idea of the Free and Open Indo-Pacific strategy was originally advanced by Japan, although the regional concept of the Indo-Pacific was truly sparked by the former US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton… When Trump made his tour of Asian nations in November 2017, since he had no Asian policy of his own, going along with Japan’s FOIP initiative was his only option. » Source: Nippon.com, 09/10/2018
 « China is eager to engage the [US] president directly because they feel that the people negotiating for the president don’t always know his real bottom line. » Source: South China Morning Post, 12/10/2018