Energy producers, distributors and investors worldwide are currently facing a triple whammy of falling demand, falling capacity and price wars that cannot fail to undermine the international corporate-based energy system that we have all come to rely on. Are countries doomed to repeat the errors of the past, or can the Green Movement work with government to champion a deal based on reduced energy demand and more localised forms of generation? This coming year, running up to COP26 in Glasgow, will be vital to set the stage.<\/p>\n
COVID-19 has swept through the world in the last six months, bringing social and financial paralysis on a scale never seen before. In the process it has initiated, or accelerated, many systemic changes in the fields of travel, economics, politics and global medicine that were previously only a distant dream.[1]<\/a> Following significant declines in the demand for petrol, diesel and aviation fuels, came a glut in supply and a subsequent collapse in international fuel prices.[2]<\/a> As we look ahead to the \u2018World After\u2019 (or perhaps we should say the world with COVID-19!), we must consider how these changes will affect the climate agenda. In particular the \u2018Green Deal\u2019 proposed by the EU must be built into a blueprint for the next International Climate Conference \u2013 COP26.[3]<\/a> Will this initiative receive a boost or suffer a setback as the established energy companies struggle to recover their market share in a reduced energy paradigm?<\/p>\n Where we were at the end of 2019<\/strong><\/p>\n As 2019 drew to a close, everything was looking good for the Green agenda. The European elections had brought in a new centrist alliance of parties and the commission had finally appointed a keen supporter of the proposed Green Deal in the person of Ursula von de Leyen.[4]<\/a> In the media, the new orthodoxy declared the need for drastic action to reduce carbon emissions and so limit the impact of anthropogenic global warming. To this end, the EU has committed to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.[5]<\/a> The environmental movement was also getting increased media exposure around the world, fed by a continual stream of weather and climate related disasters. Young people were stepping up and taking a lead in the movement, led by their diminutive Swedish mouthpiece, Greta Thunberg.[6]<\/a>\u00a0 Extinction Rebellion has been very successful in changing peoples\u2019 perspectives, but its decentralised nature creates problems and these must be overcome if it is to have a clear voice and counter the charge that it is a protest without a plan\t\t