Home Nuclear-gas/ France-Germany: Two behemoths to form an Energy Union in Europe

GEAB 132

The monthly bulletin of LEAP (European Laboratory of Political Anticipation) - 15 Feb 2019

Nuclear-gas/ France-Germany: Two behemoths to form an Energy Union in Europe

In 2014, in the context of the partly energy-motivated Ukrainian crisis, European citizens became aware that 63 years after the signing of the ECSC Treaty (which, forming the basis of a coal and steel union, was the starting point for the European project) there was no Energy Union in Europe. The price of Russian gas, to take just one example, was negotiated country by country, with the rich and powerful countries (Germany) getting the most attractive tariffs and the smaller ones (especially the poorer countries of the former Soviet Union that were highly dependent on Russian gas) paying the highest price. Jean Monnet, if you only knew…

Since then, in terms of Russian gas, we’ve heard mostly about the pipelines that are to bypass Ukraine – the former South Stream, now renamed the Turkish Stream[1] (passing through Turkey and Greece) and the Nord Stream (passing through the Baltic Sea and Germany). Both projects are facing ongoing difficulties.

But let’s focus for a minute on the war between the Germans and Americans (the latter being supported by the European Commission)[2] around this issue. The United States is demanding either a halt to the project or that it be rebalanced in favour of their liquid gas through the creation of LNG ports in Europe,[3] all in the name of European energy independence (though this independence is already acknowledged in the supplies of Algerian (460 TWh) and Norwegian (1114 TWh) gas, in particular, vs 1849 TWh of Russian gas).

Figure 1 – Main imports of natural gas from the European Union in 2017. Source: BP Statistical Review 2018.

 

For their part, the Russians claim that the Ukrainian gas pipeline will not be interrupted and that the bypass lines are only intended to secure a consistent, steady supply to Europe.

Comments

To leave a comment sign up now
Contents

The gradual disappearance of the previous world order’s straitjackets of stability (international organisations, treaties, alliances, various regulations...) is becoming alarming. Will this alarm act as a spur or will it [...]

To be able to advance in a complex world that is in full transition, it is helpful to have a GPS system. This triannual calendar of future events is one [...]

Of course, there is this temptation of reverting to national or regional levels. However, there is also the Internet that connects the world lastingly. As a matter of fact globalized [...]

Have you noticed that all the efforts to regulate debt, derivatives, banks etc., made following the subprime crisis and meeting with varying degrees of success over the last ten years, [...]

A reminder that our recommendations are not for speculative purposes, therefore short-term, that they don’t aim to win more, but rather to lose less (even nothing) because in the case [...]

Related articles
GEAB
15 Jun 2022

End-2022 – The signing of the Armenian-Azerbaijani peace agreement ushers in a new future for the South Caucasus

#caucasus #geopolitics #governance #world

The Ukrainian crisis is currently allowing many countries to advance their pawns. Turkey, in partnership with Israel and at the forefront of these actors, is inventing the future of the [...]

GEAB
15 Jun 2022

2023 – 2025: Blackout risks. Responding to the imperative of prosilience

#economy #energy #finance #geopolitics #governance

Denial, illusion of security, feeling of powerlessness and unpreparedness seem to prevail in terms of preparing the population for the risk of a blackout on a European scale. Blackout is [...]

GEAB
15 Jun 2022
free

Editorial: 2023-2030 – Terminal phase of the ‘boring’ apocalypse

#geopolitics #governance #society #world

The tangle of all the crises in the making is reaching such an intensity that it is hard to believe that a major rupture will not occur by the end [...]